![]() ![]() ![]() Why do you want to fuse 2 features that already are in the same body ? Feature editing modeling concept is that stacked operations are already 'fused'. This tends to prove that either you're not a so good engineer, or you didn't understand the workflow basis (or maybe both). ![]() I hope that developers of this software or the community won't take my comment as negative critiques, but as feedback or suggestion and I am sure one day FreeCAD will be the strongest alternative in open-source CAD software. So for me it is better to QUIT to learn and try this software further until it has been improved as 'actual alternative' as same as INKSCAPE, BLENDER, LIBREOFFICE, KRITA and so on. On the other hand, if Inkscape and Scribus combined, they can be used professionally, WHICH IS THE BEAUTY OF OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE. For instance, if I choose Blender with Hard Surface plug-in can satisfy product design and 3D modeling, except parametric modeling and tree view. In conclusion, open-source CAD software such as FreeCAD and LibreCAD can never be used professionally as compare to other open-source software. If one can see, what is wrong when I did Boolean to Merge those RIBS (Green colored) with PAD, the POCKET is Filled ? Why there is a relation between POCKET and PAD at the same time even though it is exempted while choosing it from Tree view.Ĭoming to Modeling workbench, I am surprised why Part & Part design has separated whereas it is actually a combined concepts and should be together under one umbrella. WHY ON EARTH.png (91.16 KiB) Viewed 2251 times If this very basic function are this much messed then who would go further (except hobbyist) to test another tools in any workbench. For example, have a look below images which follow its sequence behavior and how hard to configure at first for new user. What I mean is that it is not even meet the basic technical tools behavior and its functionality. The very first few days of glance and trying to try out the potential of software, was not expected as I have encountered with Inkscape, GIMP, LibreOffice, which satisfy the basic to intermediate performance of their alternatives. After that I have seen FreeCAD and LibreCAD. are 65% out of 100% close to their 'commercial' alternatives. (3) Small scale industries where mass production is not concernĪs I, myself, an open-source enthusiast, I have seen Blender, Inkscape, GIMP etc. So First thing first, when I was first encountered with FreeCAD and LibreCAD through Google and its website, At first, I thought it would be great alternative to other known CAD packages, which is indeed but only for Although I really appreciate the effort which developers made this software OPEN for community. It is understandable that, if CAD engineers write a piece of code to make Software and Developers do 3D modeling on a CAD software is like, ONCE IN A BLUE MOON. Let's Critique from an eyes of Professional CAD Engineer and their perspective. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |